The Washington Post's Betrayal of Deep Throat: Covered Up Watergate and Began

Postgate: How the Washington Post Betrayed Deep Throat, Covered Up Watergate, and Began Today’s Partisan Advocacy Journalism

by John O'Connor

4.5 out of 5

Language	:	English
File size	:	2687 KB
Text-to-Speech	:	Enabled
Screen Reader	:	Supported
Enhanced typesetting	:	Enabled
Word Wise	:	Enabled
Print length	:	314 pages
Lending	:	Enabled

FREE

The Watergate scandal is one of the most infamous political scandals in American history. It led to the resignation of President Richard Nixon and cast a dark shadow over the Nixon administration. The Washington Post played a pivotal role in uncovering the Watergate scandal, but its involvement was not without controversy. The newspaper's suppression of Deep Throat's identity and its role in downplaying the scandal had a profound impact on the course of history.

The Washington Post's Involvement in Watergate

The Washington Post first became involved in the Watergate scandal in June 1972, when reporters Bob Woodward and Carl Bernstein began investigating the break-in at the Democratic National Committee headquarters. Woodward and Bernstein quickly realized that the break-in was part of a larger conspiracy involving the Nixon administration. They began working with a confidential source, who they later identified as "Deep Throat." Deep Throat provided Woodward and Bernstein with crucial information that helped to uncover the Watergate scandal.

The Suppression of Deep Throat's Identity

The Washington Post's decision to suppress Deep Throat's identity was a controversial one. The newspaper argued that it was necessary to protect Deep Throat's safety and to ensure that he could continue to provide them with information. However, some critics accused the Post of putting its own interests ahead of the public's right to know. The Post's decision to suppress Deep Throat's identity has been the subject of much debate and controversy ever since.

The Downplaying of the Scandal

In addition to suppressing Deep Throat's identity, the Washington Post also downplayed the significance of the Watergate scandal. The newspaper's early reporting on the scandal was relatively muted, and it did not give the story the prominence it deserved. This was due in part to the fact that the Post's publisher, Katharine Graham, was a close friend of Nixon. Graham was reluctant to publish anything that could damage Nixon's presidency.

The Impact of the Post's Cover-Up

The Washington Post's cover-up of Watergate had a profound impact on the course of history. The newspaper's suppression of Deep Throat's identity and its downplaying of the scandal allowed Nixon to remain in office for two more years. This gave Nixon time to obstruct justice and to destroy evidence that could have been used against him. The Post's cover-up also helped to create a climate of distrust and cynicism that has plagued American politics ever since.

The Legacy of Deception

The Washington Post's involvement in the Watergate cover-up is a dark chapter in American journalism. The newspaper's betrayal of Deep Throat and its downplaying of the scandal had a profound impact on the course of history. The Post's legacy of deception continues to haunt the newspaper to this day.

The Washington Post's involvement in the Watergate cover-up is a complex and controversial story. The newspaper's decision to suppress Deep Throat's identity and its downplaying of the scandal were both controversial decisions that had a profound impact on the course of history. The Post's legacy of deception continues to haunt the newspaper to this day.

Postgate: How the Washington Post Betrayed Deep Throat, Covered Up Watergate, and Began Today’s Partisan Advocacy Journalism

by John O'Connor

4.5 out of 5

Language	:	English
File size	:	2687 KB
Text-to-Speech	:	Enabled
Screen Reader	:	Supported
Enhanced typesetting	:	Enabled
Word Wise	:	Enabled
Print length	:	314 pages
Lending	:	Enabled

FREE