Surveillance, Counter-Terrorism, and Comparative Constitutionalism: A Critical Assessment of the "Flexible" Constitution in the UK and US

This article provides a critical assessment of the "flexible" constitution in the UK and US, focusing on the impact of surveillance and counter-terrorism measures on constitutional rights and freedoms. It argues that the "flexible" constitution has enabled the expansion of surveillance powers and the erosion of constitutional safeguards, leading to a diminished protection of individual rights. The article concludes by calling for a more robust and principled approach to constitutionalism that prioritizes the protection of fundamental rights and freedoms in the face of security threats.

The concept of constitutionalism has been central to the development of modern democratic societies. Constitutionalism is based on the idea that government power must be limited and exercised in accordance with the rule of law. Constitutions typically set out the fundamental rights and freedoms of citizens, and establish checks and balances on government power to prevent the abuse of authority.

However, in recent years, the concept of constitutionalism has come under strain in many countries, particularly in the context of national security. The rise of terrorism and other security threats has led to the adoption of a range of surveillance and counter-terrorism measures that have raised concerns about the erosion of constitutional rights and freedoms.

Surveillance, Counter-Terrorism and Comparative Constitutionalism (Routledge Research in Terrorism and the Law)

by James Gow

5 out of 5

Language	:	English
File size	:	1482 KB
Text-to-Speech	:	Enabled
Screen Reader	:	Supported
Enhanced typesetting	:	Enabled
Word Wise	:	Enabled
Print length	:	355 pages
X-Ray for textbooks	:	Enabled

FREE

This article examines the impact of surveillance and counter-terrorism measures on constitutionalism in the UK and US. It argues that the "flexible" constitutions of these countries have enabled the expansion of surveillance powers and the erosion of constitutional safeguards, leading to a diminished protection of individual rights. The article concludes by calling for a more robust and principled approach to constitutionalism that prioritizes the protection of fundamental rights and freedoms in the face of security threats.

The UK and US constitutions are often described as "flexible" constitutions. This means that they are not contained in a single document, but rather consist of a body of laws, conventions, and practices that have developed over time. This flexibility has been seen as a strength of the UK and US constitutions, as it allows them to adapt to changing circumstances. However, it has also been argued that the flexibility of these constitutions has made them vulnerable to erosion in the face of security threats.

One of the key features of the "flexible" constitution is that it gives the government a wide degree of discretion in the area of national security. This discretion has been used to justify a range of surveillance and counter-terrorism measures that would not be possible under a more rigid constitution. For example, the UK government has introduced a number of surveillance measures in recent years, including the bulk collection of communications data and the use of facial recognition technology. The US government has also introduced a number of surveillance and counter-terrorism measures, including the Patriot Act and the use of drones.

The expansion of surveillance powers and the erosion of constitutional safeguards in the UK and US has had a significant impact on individual rights and freedoms. These measures have led to a decrease in privacy, an increase in discrimination, and a chilling effect on freedom of expression.

Privacy

Surveillance measures such as the bulk collection of communications data and the use of facial recognition technology have led to a significant decrease in privacy for individuals. These measures allow the government to collect and store vast amounts of data about individuals' communications, movements, and associations. This data can be used to build up a detailed profile of an individual's life, and can be used to track their movements, identify their contacts, and even predict their future behavior.

Discrimination

Surveillance and counter-terrorism measures have also been used to discriminate against certain groups of people, particularly Muslims and immigrants. For example, the US government has been accused of using surveillance to target Muslims for investigation and prosecution. In the UK, the government has been accused of using stop-and-search powers to target black and Muslim people.

Freedom of Expression

Surveillance and counter-terrorism measures have also had a chilling effect on freedom of expression. Individuals may be less likely to express their opinions or engage in political activity if they fear that they are being watched by the government. This can lead to a narrowing of public debate and a decrease in democratic participation.

The erosion of constitutional rights and freedoms in the UK and US is a serious threat to democracy and the rule of law. It is essential that we develop a more robust and principled approach to constitutionalism that prioritizes the protection of fundamental rights and freedoms in the face of security threats.

This approach should be based on the following principles:

• The rule of law: The government must be subject to the rule of law, and its powers must be clearly defined and limited.
• Proportionality: Surveillance and counter-terrorism measures must be proportionate to the threat they are intended to address.
• Necessity: Surveillance and counter-terrorism measures must be necessary to address the threat they are intended to address.
• Transparency: The government must be transparent about its use of surveillance and counter-terrorism measures.
• Accountability: The government must be held accountable for its use of surveillance and counter-terrorism measures.

By adopting a more robust and principled approach to constitutionalism, we can help to protect our fundamental rights and freedoms in the face of security threats.

The "flexible" constitution has enabled the expansion of surveillance powers and the erosion of constitutional safeguards in the UK and US, leading to a diminished protection of individual rights. This is a serious threat to democracy and the rule of law. It is essential that we develop a more robust and principled approach to constitutionalism that prioritizes the protection of fundamental rights and freedoms in the face of security threats.

Surveillance, Counter-Terrorism and Comparative Constitutionalism (Routledge Research in Terrorism and the Law)

by James Gow

5 out of 5

Language	:	English
File size	:	1482 KB
Text-to-Speech	:	Enabled
Screen Reader	:	Supported
Enhanced typesetting	:	Enabled
Word Wise	:	Enabled
Print length	:	355 pages
X-Ray for textbooks	:	Enabled

FREE